I’ve always been fascinated and appalled by this moment. And yet I do believe that Beauty is a mark of both the True and the Good. So why is this so obviously wrong?
Perhaps because the sort of beauty on offer is so shallow, so unrelated to the ontological beauty of allowing one’s truth and goodness to be perceptible.
Yet I’m afraid that what Glinda means by beauty is what most people mean by beauty. We all know what’s meant by the “beauty department” in a store or a “beauty magazine.” Does this mean that Glinda’s equation is what most people think when they’re told there’s a connection between the Beautiful, the True, and the Good? Scary, if true.